Arama They Didn't

11:54 am - 12/18/2011

Lee urges compensation for sex slaves; Noda says issue is settled

South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak urged Japan Sunday to have the “courage” to compensate ageing wartime sex slaves before it is too late to let the two nations move forward.

Lee told Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda in Japan’s ancient capital of Kyoto that the issue had prevented their countries from becoming “true partners” in the years since World War II.

Japan, which insists the issue was legally settled four decades ago, promised only that it would “think carefully” from a humanitarian standpoint, but stopped well short of offering a fresh apology, officials said.

“South Korea and Japan should become real partners for peace and stability in this region,” the visiting South Korean president told his opposite number.

“And for that to happen, we need to have the courage to resolve as a priority the issue of military comfort women, which has been a stumbling block between our countries,” Lee said.

Comfort women, a euphemism used to describe women forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops before and during World War II, came to widespread notice in the early 1990s when ageing victims went public.

A dwindling band of women have since vociferously demanded compensation and an apology from Japan, which mounted a brutal occupation of the Korean peninsula between 1910 and 1945.

Last week supporters held their 1,000th weekly protest at Tokyo’s embassy in Seoul, unveiling a statue of a young woman in traditional Korean dress who they said represented the thousands of women forced to work in Japan’s military brothels.

Tokyo has repeatedly apologized for occupation-era crimes but has consistently rejected South Korea’s proposal for specific talks on the comfort women, insisting all issues were settled in a 1965 accord normalizing relations between the two countries, which also included a financial settlement.

Japan maintains that it was up to the then military government in Seoul to disburse compensation appropriately.

Speaking after the meeting, Noda said he had asked Lee to help ensure the removal of the statue outside the Japanese mission, but stressed that Tokyo’s stance on the issue was unchanged.

“I told him that our nation’s position is as he is already aware,” he told reporters.

Lee had long shied away from a public discussion of the subject, which has rumbled in the background of relations for a number of years.

However, the issue came to the fore in August when a South Korean court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government not to negotiate with Tokyo over the women’s individual rights to seek compensation from Japan.

In their meeting, Lee attempted to persuade Japan to go beyond the 1965 agreement.

“The comfort women issue can be solved immediately if the Japanese government looks at things at a different perspective,” Lee told Noda, according to Seoul’s presidential spokesman.

“This is a matter of national sentiment and emotion rather than laws,” Lee said, urging Noda to make a “political” decision based on “warm heart”, rather than technical judgement.

“If there is no sincere measure, there will be second or third monuments like this whenever each old lady passes away,” Lee said, referring to the statue.

After arriving in Japan Saturday, Lee told a gathering of ethnic Koreans in Osaka that Tokyo must resolve the issue for the sake of future bilateral ties, or risk the “burden” remaining forever.

He said that the issue was becoming more urgent as the number of women known to have been enslaved diminished with elderly survivors dying off.

“Resolving this issue while they are alive will be of big help for the two countries to move forward toward the future,” he said.



source

I wouldn't remove those statues.
kame_94 19th-Dec-2011 01:22 am (UTC)
Both articles include the fact that since Prime Ministers (Such as Kan & Koizumi) went to Yasukuni Shrine and prayed, their apologies were insincere. Yasukuni Shrine has over 2.5 million Japanese war dead, including 14 war criminals. Just because it includes 14 Class-A war criminals does not mean that's who they're trying to pay their respects to. I think the 2.5 million outweigh the 14. It would be disrespectful to the rest of the 2.5 million for them not to go to pray at that shrine, just because of those 14.
Another says Maruyama's was insincere because 2 months beforehand, he said Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty was legal - which, from my understanding, had been a debate for many years, having nothing related to the comfort women at all. It was just a displeasing thing for Koreans to hear. It had nothing to do with his apology for things that happened during war times.
South Korea and Japan both relinquished the right to demand more compensation in a 1965 treaty after the financial settlement was paid, which one of your links completely agrees with.

"In my meeting with congressional representatives, I explained my thoughts - namely that, both personally and as Prime Minister of Japan, my heart goes out in sympathy to all those who suffered extreme hardships as comfort women; and I expressed my apologies for the fact that they were forced to endure such extreme and harsh conditions.
.....
Human rights were violated in many parts of the world during the 20 th Century; therefore we must work to make the 21st century a wonderful century in which no human rights are violated. And the Government of Japan and I wish to make significant contributions to that end." ( April 27, 2007 ) - Prime Minister Abe
That one apology out of many sounds good enough for me.
liime_arix 19th-Dec-2011 01:54 am (UTC)
How is that not politically motivated. There's other shrines that aren't controversial that they can pay their respects at though. Look at what Noda did this year. He knew that shrines are controversial and therefore him and his cabinet did not visit them. However the opposition did. If the shrine is controversial and you as a country want to deepen your bonds with your neighbors, the least you can do is respect their wishes.


A bit about the Shrine:

Within the shrine, the souls of the dead are worshiped rather than just remembered.

According to Japan's national Shinto religion, humans are transformed into "kami" or deities when they die, and as such are worshiped by their descendants. The kami of remarkable people are enshrined.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1330223.stm
---


Many Koreans still remember that just two months after his unprecedented apology, Murayama claimed that the Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty was legal, an assertion that deeply disappointed the Koreans.

Prime Minister Abe also visited the shrine.
On the same day of Kan making his statement of apology, members of the now-opposition Liberal Democratic Party made a point by paying pilgrimage to the Yasukuni Shrine, where Class A war criminals such as Japan's wartime prime minister Hideki Tojo were honored.

Among those who visited was former prime minister Shinzo Abe, who previously made a similar war apology as Kan's when he was in office.
cuizy 19th-Dec-2011 09:32 am (UTC)
So clearly you think German head of states should go pay respects at war memorials housing nazis and maybe hitler thrown in.

Also there are 1068 war criminals

And regardless of how innocent the average Japanese soldier may be.... There is A LOT of symbolism for paying respects at a place that houses those war criminals.... If you are confused about this point you can check out Reagan's controversial visit to Bitburg
This page was loaded Jun 18th 2013, 6:18 am GMT.